DWP Chief Makes Case for Rate Hikes

Speaking in Sherman Oaks, the utility's Ron Nichols blames aging pipes, government regulations and other factors for driving up water, electricity costs.

Residents who came to the Sherman Oaks Homeowners Association meeting Thursday to give an earful to Ron Nichols—head of the city’s Department of Water and Power—over proposed water and electric rate hikes, instead got an earful from him.

Nichols, DWP general manager for the past 10 months, listed state and federal requirements, looming time deadlines, aging pipes and environmental mandates that are costing the DWP billions of dollars.

“We’re going through some absolutely unprecedented changes,” he said, “the vast majority of which are outside of our control. ... All those things are driving our costs.”

Rate increases of about 5 percent annually for electricity and water over the next three years originally proposed for Nov. 1 this year are on hold until a ratepayer advocate is appointed, perhaps as soon as January, to review the proposed increases, he said.

Among the cost drivers is the federal government, Nichols explained, which requires water reservoirs be covered. Los Angeles has more open reservoirs than any other city. Five have been covered so far and five more remain, he said.

To meet federal air quality requirements Los Angeles reduced by half the amount of water it withdraws from Owens Lake in Inyo County to limit the amount of dust kicked up when the water evaporates. That and other dust-reduction requirements have cost the utility $1 billion over the last decade, he said.

The city’s own aging infrastructure also imposes costs. The city has 7,200 miles of water pipes, some of them 100 years old, yet replaces only 18 to 25 miles of pipe yearly.

“You do the math,” Nichols said. “That’s about 300 to 400 years to replace them. Pipes don’t last 300 to 400 years.”

As a result, city crews repair about three or four broken pipes daily, he said.

On the power side, the city has three natural gas-fired plants that pull in seawater for cooling, which the federal government has banned because of the negative impact on marine life. The city must build new power units at a cost of $2.2 billion with a 2029 deadline, Nichols said.

Federal environmental regulations banning coal-fired power plants would end Los Angeles’ arrangements with the Navajo Plant in Arizona and the Intermountain Power Facility in Utah when those contracts expire and bring additional costs.

Meanwhile, the state wants utilities to receive 30 percent of their energy from renewable energy by 2020 and also requires utilities to provide rebates to homeowners for solar energy projects. For DWP, the rebates come to $30 million annually. Another $800 million yearly is spent on replacing utility poles some of which are 50 to 70 years old, Nichols said.

Despite this litany, a questioner at Thursday’s SOHA meeting asked why water rates were going up even with successful conservation efforts to reduce consumption.

“If you weren’t doing conservation, we would be buying more water from MWD [Metropolitan Water District of Southern California] and your rates would be higher,” Nichols said.

“I know it’s hard to stand, cutting back and cutting back,” he added, “but the answer is, [without conservation] your rates would be higher yet.”

Before heading DWP, Nichols spent 35 years in the energy and water utility industry, specializing in developing and financing utility infrastructures and systems. In California he brought new electricity contracts to help solve the state’s 2000-2001 energy crisis and, in 2007, assisted in evaluating how carbon levels and electricity costs could be reduced statewide and in the West using energy efficiencies and renewable energy.

Scott Killeen November 19, 2011 at 03:36 AM
The people of Los Angeles have conserved 19% water usage for each of the last three years minimum! Stop with the BS! Don't treat us regular folks as though we are ignorant and stupid! What the hell has every homeowner in LA been paying for then. AGAIN one item was not mentioned by the DWP or Ellen, paying for pensions! Prove me wrong please. The unions requires NO layoffs while hundreds of thousands of people in LA have lost their jobs! It's not right and a fundamental change must happen in order to control cost that every person pays for in Los Angeles for actual water and electricity usage and NOT for paying the DWP worker union pensions! Ellen seems like she was crying for the DWP because of ALL the "this and that" crying the agency is required to do. Don't try to kid anyone Ellen the DWP makes a LOT OF MONEY! It's a fact!
Ellen Vukovich November 19, 2011 at 05:39 PM
I would think by now that the intelligent people of Los Angeles were fully aware of the pension obligations - it's a nationwide problem. However, Mr. Nichols didn't raise the subject, for whatever reasons. You are wrong, Scott. I wasn't shedding tears for the DWP just discussing what I heard. No different that the reporter.
Scott Killeen November 19, 2011 at 06:39 PM
Some how I don't think the non intelligent (me) people of LA knew.... www.ladwpneighborhoodnews.com/go/doc/1643/1109759/ Page 26! 66% of 626 million for PENSIONS! That's about $400+ million dollars. This is titled "2011-12 Fiscal year BASIC NEEDS budget " LADWP benefits costs. Retirement costs will increase by 2.3% in 2011-12. But hey don't worry, for the next three years retirement cost will be 100 million more.
kevin November 19, 2011 at 07:58 PM
Only two agencies in L.A.actually make money- D.W.P, and.... Parking regulation.
Scott Killeen November 19, 2011 at 10:25 PM
Page 9 is VERY informative also! www.ladwpneighborhoodnews.com/go/doc/1643/1109759/


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »